“Frozen”
a review by Darby O’Gill

Well, if you’ve ever been skiing before, I’m sure these thoughts have passed through your mind at least once or twice. What if this ski lift got stuck? Would I be able to jump from this height? How long would I wait before trying to get down? All these questions and more are the subject matter of the movie Frozen. When three friends… Well, two best friends and a tag-along girlfriend hit the slopes of a New England ski resort, all seems to be fine until the mountain announces they will be closing early due to an incoming winter storm. Having spent most the day on the bunny slope to accommodate Dan’s girlfriend Parker, played by Emma Bell, the trio decide to end their day on an advanced trail, but have to bribe the ski lift operator to let them on the lift after he’s already announced the last run of the day. One slight misunderstanding later, the three find themselves stranded on the middle of the ski lift a fifty feet above the ground, and due to the mountain’s schedule, could possibly be stuck up there till next weekend, when the resort will be open again.

Frozen is like Open Water on a ski lift. It’s that little movie that will most likely get great word of mouth, and hopefully get seen by a lot of people. Let’s start that great word of mouth here. I was really excited to see writer/director Adam Green’s new movie. I enjoyed his last venture, Hatchet, but I’m even a bigger fan of Adams because he features my favorite shop in the whole world, Newbury Comics, in his films. Newbury Comic is a music/comic/toy shop in Massachusetts. I have been a loyal customer since high school, and highly recommend shopping at one if you ever get the chance. Okay, I’m getting a little off topic here. The other thing I really enjoyed about Frozen, was its ability to take place in one location for the entire film. Shawn Ashmore, Emma Bell, and Kevin Zegers give outstanding performances, and I think the audience will find it easy to relate to their characters. But, I think the thing I loved the most, is that Adam Green gave a shout-out to Wachusett Mountain in the film, which is the mountain that I skied on growing up in New England. I’m just glad I didn’t have to ski there this year after seeing this movie. I really hope this movie does well. I think that its little movies like this that make movie making exciting. It may not be the best movie of the year, but it is truly the first must see movie of 2010 in my book. In a nutshell, go see it. Don’t see it in a nutshell, see it in a theatre. You know what I mean. Go see it.

Rating:




Best Motion Picture – Drama

District 9


Best Performance by an Actress in a Motion Picture – Drama

Meryl StreepJulie & Julia


Best Performance by an Actor in a Motion Picture – Drama

Sharlto CopleyDistrict 9


Best Performance by a Supporting Actress in a Motion Picture – Drama

Diane KrugerInglourious Basterds


Best Performance by a Supporting Actor in a Motion Picture – Drama

Christoph WaltzInglourious Basterds


Best Motion Picture – Comedy

The Hangover


Best Performance by an Actress in a Motion Picture – Comedy

Meryl StreepIt’s Complicated


Best Performance by an Actor in a Motion Picture – Comedy

Jason BatemanExtract


Best Performance by a Supporting Actress in a Motion Picture – Comedy

Rashida JonesI Love You Man


Best Performance by a Supporting Actor in a Motion Picture – Comedy

Zach GalifianakisThe Hangover


Best Director – Motion Picture

Zack SnyderWatchmen


Best Animated Feature Film

Coraline


Best Original Screenplay

Pirate Radio/The Boat That RockedRichard Curtis


Best Adapted Screenplay

WatchmenDavid Hayter & Alex Tse


Best Original Score

Sherlock HolmesHans Zimmer & Lorne Balfe


Best Original Song

Stu’s Song” by Ed HelmsThe Hangover


Best Art Direction

WatchmenHelen Jarvis, James Steuart & Francois Audouy


Best Cinematography

Where the Wild Things AreLance Acord


Best Costume Design

Pirate Radio/The Boat That RockedJoanna Johnston


Best Visual Effects

Where the Wild Things Are


Best Television Series – Drama

Burn Notice


Best Performance by an Actress in a Television Series – Drama

Julianna MarguliesThe Good Wife


Best Performance by an Actor in a Television Series – Drama

Hugh LaurieHouse M.D.


Best Performance by a Supporting Actress in a Television Series – Drama

Olivia WilliamsDollhouse


Best Performance by a Supporting Actor in a Television Series – Drama

Enver GjokajDollhouse


Best Performance by an Ensemble Cast in a Television Series – Drama

Burn Notice

Jeffrey Donovan, Gabrielle Anwar, Bruce Campbell, & Sharon Gless


Best Writing for a Television Series – Drama

Dollhouse


Best Television Series – Comedy

The Big Bang Theory


Best Performance by an Actress in a Television Series – Comedy

Julia Louis-DreyfusThe New Adventures of Old Christine


Best Performance by an Actor in a Television Series – Comedy

Larry DavidCurb Your Enthusiasm


Best Performance by a Supporting Actress in a Television Series – Comedy

Paula MarshallGary Unmarried


Best Performance by a Supporting Actor in a Television Series – Comedy

Jim ParsonsThe Big Bang Theory


Best Performance by an Ensemble Cast in a Television Series – Comedy

The Big Bang Theory

Johnny Galecki, Jim Parsons, Keley Cuoco, Simon Helberg, & Kunal Nayyar


Best Writing for a Television Series – Comedy

The Big Bang Theory


Best Animated Television Series

The Venture Bros.


Best Movie Poster

Terminator: Salvation


Best Movie Trailer

Where the Wild Things Are


Best Comic Book Series

Blackest NightGeoff Johns


Death Coach Award

The Fourth Kind

(This award is given each year to the worst movie of the year. It’s the movie that the studios should have put on the Death Coach rather than in theaters.)


King of the Leprechauns Award

David Tennant

For his outstanding run as the 10th Doctor in the Doctor Who series. His song has ended far too soon, but he will always be my Doctor.

(This award is the Banshee’s equivalent to a Man/Woman of the Year Award or Lifetime Achievement Award)

“Avatar”
a review by Darby O’Gill

Okay, so I finally got around to seeing Avatar. Ah, well… It was definitely… I think… You know what? Let’s come back to that. Avatar is the story of human beings doing what they do best, taking what they want. It’s the year 2154 and groups of people from Earth have traveled to the distant planet of Pandora to harvest a rare mineral called Unobtanium. Don’t worry. We’ll come back to that too. The only thing standing in the way of our obtaining the Unobtanium (God, even I want to punch me in the face.) is the natives of Pandora, called the Na’vi. They’re basically giant blue cat-monkeys. Sorry if anyone thinks that’s racist. I don’t want to aggravate you’re Pandora Blues Syndrome. We’ll get back to that as well. So, before the conflict started getting out of hand, the humans tried to negotiate with the Na’vi, by using Avatars. An Avatar is a bioengineered life form that is a mix of Na’vi DNA and the human controller’s DNA. It’s like virtual reality, but you’re not in a simulated computer system. Instead, your consciousness is uploaded into the Avatar body in the real world. When Jake Sully, a paraplegic war veteran, played by Sam Worthington, who’s twin brother is killed, the opportunity presents itself for Jake to step into his shoes… Well, metaphorically. Jake’s brother was set to work on the Avatar program, and since his DNA make-up matches that of his twin brother’s, Jake is able to operate his brother’s Avatar. Once in the Avatar program, Jake is met with the promise of getting his real legs back, if he would be willing to spy on the Na’vi for Colonel Miles Quaritch, played by Stephen Lang, and provide him with some inside information from behind the enemy lines. However, once on the inside, Jake finds himself questioning his loyalties, and will soon need to choose a side.

Well, okay. I guess I’ve got a few things to get back to here. First, it took James Cameron twelve years to make this movie, and I really find it hard to believe that in twelve years he couldn’t come up with something better than Unobtanium. I mean what the fuck! Are you kidding me?! You could have called it Shitanium, and even that would have been better than Unobtanium. James Cameron you’re better than that. I do have one request though James. Please do not pull a George Lucas, and make a new Terminator series that claims the Terminator’s exoskeleton is actually made of Unobtanium. That would be even more unforgivable than Titanic, which brings us to our next callback point, the Pandora Blues Syndrome. People are claiming to find themselves dealing with depression symptoms after seeing the film, because Pandora is not a real place. I’m not even going to touch that. Let’s move on.

I didn’t really care for this movie. Let me clarify, I didn’t find myself getting emerged in this world at all. When you see a movie like this, like Jurassic Park or Harry Potter, I think it’s really important to care about the world the film is trying to sell you on. At no point during Avatar, did I find myself immersed or excited to be experiencing this world, and in 3-D no less. Don’t get me wrong, the world of Pandora in Avatar is well imagined, but there’s just something missing that I can’t put my finger on. Once again, I have to point out that this movie took twelve years to make! In this day and age, I think we are just not as easily impressed with ground breaking effects these days. In the last decade, we’ve seen so many amazing leaps in special effects, and it’s hard to see what took twelve years to achieve in this film. It’s the kind of thing where you really need to see the behind the scenes footage to fully appreciate what they’ve done.

With that said, let’s talk about the story. Did you ever see Dances with Wolves? Great! So, we’ve talked about the story. I’m not kidding; this is Dances with Wolves in space. I understand that every story has been told before, but come on! It’s really hard to enjoy a movie when you don’t care about the world you are in, and you know every twist and turn of the story, because you’ve heard it before. Avatar is so not the best picture of the year! I can’t believe it won the Golden Globe for Best Picture Drama. It shouldn’t even be in that category. It’s more of an animated film than anything else. I would say 80% of it is CGI generated. With all that said, I think it’s an okay movie. At no point did I want to stop watching it, I just wished I could have enjoyed it more.

Rating:


“Julie & Julia”
a review by Darby O’Gill

I know, not the type of movie you would expect to find here, but I’m all about breaking the mold. Truth be told, I was home over the holidays and my mother made me watch it. Also, my grandmother was a huge Julia Child fan, and I grew up watching her show with my gram in my younger years, so I was a little interested to see Meryl Streep’s portrayal of her. But, that’s not to say I wouldn’t be more than happy to give any film a fair chance. I do also realize that this is another Amy Adams’ movie, and if you read my Leap Year review, you all know how I feel about her. It’s not that much of a problem in this film, because she’s not really the lead; she kind of shares that title with Streep. Although, just for the record, it is still more Amy Adams than I would like. Enough of this tomfoolery, let’s get to the review.

Julie & Julia mainly takes place in 2002, and tells the story of Julie Powell, played by Amy Adams, who has just moved to New York with her husband, played by Chris Messina, and finds herself looking for an escape from her day job job at the Lower Manhattan Development Corporation’s call center. She decides to start a blog, but she isn’t quite sure what to blog about, until she comes up with the idea of cooking every recipe in Julia Child’s Mastering the Art of French Cooking cookbook, and giving herself a year in which to do it. The other part of this story takes place in 1949, when Julia Child, played by Meryl Streep, and her husband Paul, played by Stanley Tucci, have just moved to Paris for Paul’s job at the American Embassy. Julia is looking for something to fill her time while Paul’s at work, and starts her cooking career. She finds it hard however to learn from the French cookbooks, and realizes that there are no American French cookbook. Therefore, she decides to publish her own cookbook where the French recipes would be a little easier for American cooks to follow.

Okay, let’s cut to the chase. I wasn’t a big fan of this movie. The one thing I did find impressive, other than Meryl Streep’s performance, was writer/director Nora Ephron’s ability to intertwine Julie Powell’s novel Julie & Julia with Julia Child and Alex Prud’humme’s My Life in France. By finding the parallels in these two women’s lives, and making the movie just as much about Julia Child’s life, as it is about Julie’s blog challenge, was this film’s saving grace. Well, that and Meryl Streep’s amazing performance. She really embodied the essences of Julia Child in this movie. It’s probably not much of a shock, that I would have enjoyed this movie 100% more, if it was just a story about Julia Child, and skipped all the Amy Adams stuff. I think the movie is better than most would suspect, but in the end it’s just not that satisfying, and leaves you just plain hungry… literally.

Rating:


“Up In the Air”
a review by Darby O’Gill

I think the best way to sum up my feelings about Up In the Air, is just that… up in the air. I know a lot of people are going over the moon for this film, but I’m not as in love with it. Don’t get me wrong, I think the movie is fantastic, but I just don’t think it’s as groundbreaking as people are making it out to be. The writing, directing, and performances in Up In the Air are all top notch. I just feel there have been other, all be it smaller, films that have handled the subject matter better. It’s not their fault they couldn’t land George Clooney to star, and the son of Ghostbusters to direct. Now, I’m not hating on Jason Reitman. In fact, I thought Juno was great! And, I think he’s proved himself to be an extremely talented director with this film, and I look forward to his next.

In Up In the Air, Ryan Bingham, played by George Clooney, is in the business of letting people go. Ryan travels from city to city and fires hundreds of people a day. What a wonderfully uplifting theme for a movie in these times when unemployment is at an all-time high. I guess the studio just really wanted to release a movie that people could relate to. As you would imagine, Ryan is quite the frequent flyer, and is very close to reaching his ultimate goal of ten million frequent flyer miles. But before he can, his company is about to do some budget cuts of their own. Why fly all over the country, when you can just iChat or Skype with the client from the home office? But before the changes can take effect, Ryan gets one last trip as he takes a young protégé, played by Anna Kendrick, on the road for some old school hands on training. At its heart, Up In the Air is about a man coming to terms with his life, and also the fact that we may not always end up with the life we planned for. It is a really well written script, which is equally matched by Jason Reitman’s amazing directing style.

George Clooney gives an outstanding performance, but its just Clooney being classic brilliant Clooney. You could easily intercut Ryan Bingham with Danny Ocean and not miss a beat. I’m not saying Clooney phoned it in. I’m just saying that this character is the same sort of soft spoken intelligent man that we come to expect to see Clooney play. Truth be told, I wouldn’t want anyone else to play a role like this, but I really can’t see this as the best performance of his career. Which brings me back to my first point, this movie is all over the award shows this year, and I just honestly don’t think it’s one of the best movies of the year. It might be in my top ten, but definitely not in my top five for this year. Up In the Air really reminds me of this great movie that came out back in 2000, called Diamond Men. I know, you’ve never heard of it. And, that is a crime. But, if you are one of the millions of people that loved Up In the Air, and think it disserves to win best picture, do yourself a favor and watch Diamond Men. You might also want to checkout one of my all time favorite movies, Spring Forward; which also has some of the same undertones as Up In the Air, and is quite a fantastic movie of it’s own. Look, Up In the Air is a great movie, and I will gladly add it to my DVD library. But, best movie of the year? Maybe not. Don’t get me wrong, I highly recommend seeing Up In the Air, it’s everything a movie should be, and you’ll be very glad that you saw it.

Rating:


“Leap Year”
a review by Darby O’Gill

Well, it must be January. You know, that time of year when studios dump their leftover crap into theatres. Case in point, I give you Leap Year. I don’t know why I went, but I did, and it sure as hell can’t be unseen. I don’t want to sound rude… And, I’m sure many of you will disagree with me, but Amy Adams… Really?! I don’t see it. I’m sorry. I can’t watch her in a lead roll for two hours. I just don’t like her. I think she’s fine when she’s playing a supporting roll, but I just can’t take her as a lead, which is a big surprise to me, because I’m always saying I like it when a stereo typical supporting actress gets to play the lead. But, for some reason Amy Adams just doesn’t do it for me.

In Leap Year, we follow Anna, played by Adams, as she travels to Ireland in hopes of proposing to her long time boyfriend on February 29th. It’s an Irish tradition that women can propose to the men once every four years on leap day. Believe it or not, a series of “unforeseen” events stand in her way, and the only way to make it her boyfriend in time is by hitching a ride with a bartender that hates her. Can’t see where this is going? If that is truly the case, you are in fact the problem with today’s movie going public. I know every story has been told before, but come on! Can we at least try and do something new with it? Leap Year doesn’t break any new ground. In fact, if you want to see a better version of this movie, watch The Matchmaker.

The bottom line here is… Skip it. But, I’m sure you already knew that. Hell, I should have already known that. I like to try and see everything I can, but sometimes some movies should just be skipped. You’re pretty much better off leaping Leap Year this year, or any year for that matter.

Rating:


“It’s Complicated”
a review by Darby O’Gill

There’s nothing complicated about it; Nancy Meyers has once again delivered a hit! It’s Complicated is great! The story may not be new, but the way it’s told is. Meyers has written a script that Hollywood would love to make with a 20 or 30 something cast, but she didn’t write it for them. No, she wrote it for a cast in their 60’s, and I for one am really glad that she did.

In It’s Complicated, we follow the story of Jane, played by Meryl Streep, a woman that finds herself in her 60’s and single. Her ex-husband of many years, Jake, played by Alec Bladwin, has remarried; in fact he has married the younger woman he was having an affair with while with Jane. Thanks to their three kids, Jane and Jake have managed to keep a civil relationship with each other despite their divorce. But, when the family travels to New York, for one of their daughter’s college graduation, the unthinkable happens. Jane and Jack hook-up after a late night of drinking, and Jane now finds herself being her ex-husband’s mistress. If now being the other woman to the woman who broke up your marriage didn’t complicate things enough for poor Jane, she suddenly finds herself sparking up a budding relationship with her architect Adam, played by Steve Martin. John Krasinski gives a nice performance as the son-in-law that knows about Jane and Jack’s secret relationship, and is tortured by keeping it just that, a secret.

I really enjoyed this film. I don’t know if it was the mood I was in, or if it’s just Nancy Meyers’ refreshing spin on things. The really nice thing is that there are no tacky jokes about age. If anyone other than Meyers had written this story it would be full of “at my age” jokes. Like I said, the movie really could have been made with a cast of thirty year olds, but there is something great about the fact that it’s not. Now, don’t get me wrong. There are jokes about being older, but the nice thing is that they don’t rely on it like most films would. The cast, as you would expect, is fantastic! The pacing is pitch perfect. And if nothing else, Nancy Meyers has once again proved that she truly is the queen of romantic comedies.

Rating:




“Fantastic Mr. Fox”
a review by Darby O’Gill

Fantastic Mr. Fox is fantastic indeed! It seems like 2009 is the year of visionary directors making classic children’s books into amazing feature films. First with Spike Jonze’s adaptation of Maurice Sendak’s classic “Where the Wild Thing Are,” and now Wes Anderson’s outstanding rendition of Roald Dahl’s “Fantastic Mr. Fox.” I can’t wait to see Steven Soderbergh’s “Goodnight Moon.”

In the film, when Mr. Fox finds out he’s about to have a family, he is forced to give up his wild ways of chicken coop raiding. Then, one day when Mr. Fox decides to buy the family a new home inside a tree on top of a hill, he is faced with the ultimate heist. Not one, not two, but three farms all ripe for the picking. How could Mr. Fox resist? So he decides to pull one last job… Well, three jobs. But, when things go south, and it’s not just Mr. Fox that has to pay the price. It also puts the whole animal community in danger.

Wes Anderson has really outdone himself. The decision to use stop-motion animation was absolutely brilliant! It totally adds to the look and feel of the film. Unlike most animated films, Anderson decided to record the cast’s vocal tracks on location, and not in a sound booth. So, if the scene takes place in a field, actors George Clooney and Meryl Streep recorded their vocal tracks together in an actual field. It may not sound like a big deal, but that’s unheard of! Most actors working on animated film don’t even meet each other until the premiere. I can’t wait to see the DVD footage of the actors in character, playing out a scene on the countryside somewhere. George Clooney is brilliant as always, and Meryl Streep is a perfect addition to the Wes Anderson family. I really hope he uses her in a live action film someday. But, I’ve got to say, Jason Schwartzman really steals the show as Mr. Fox’s son Ash. And, you have to love Wes’ eye for detail. At the end of the film, and I’m not giving anything anyway, Ash is drinking a grape juice-box while everyone else is drinking apple. It’s the little things like this that make him one of my favorite directors. The best part of this film is that even though it’s an adaptation of a children’s book, it’s still very much a Wes Anderson movie. It’s true to its source material, but still has the dialog and everything you would come to expect from a Wes Anderson movie. And, unlike Where the Wild This Are, Fantastic Mr. Fox can be enjoyed by kids and adults alike. What the cuss else do you want me to say? Go see this cussin’ movie! Cuss!

Rating:


“Did You Hear About the Morgans?”
a review by Darby O’Gill

Did You Hear About the Morgans? No? Well, they suck. But you didn’t need me to tell you that. One look at this trailer, and you should have known it was bad news from the start. Now, I realize that there are people out there that enjoy these kinds of movies, but come on. How many more of these stupid “comedies” do we need? And, I say comedies sarcastically. Look, I’m all for a great romantic comedy, but don’t just churn some piece of shit movie out just for the sake of a piece of shit movie. There are some really great writers out there. When are studios going to stop wasting their money on these talent-less hacks, and invest in some writers with some real talent?

In Did You Hear About the Morgans?, Hugh Grant plays Paul Morgan, who wants to get back together with his estranged wife Meryl, played by Sarah Jessica Parker. He gets his wish when the couple witnesses a murder, and ends up being placed in the witness-protection program together. Don’t think it can get any hokier? Well, it does. The New York city slickers get relocated to a small town in Wyoming. The comedy just writes itself, doesn’t it? I really need to stop watching movies like this. I don’t know what else to say… I usually enjoy Hugh Grant, but he’s horrible in this. Well, that’s not totally fair to him. You can only do so much with the material you’re given. Sam Elliott and Mary Steenburgen give decant performances, but I’m truly grasping at straws here. The one thing I did learn from sitting through this movie is that Wilford Brimley isn’t dead. I know! I thought he was dead too! I guess Quaker Oats and Liberty Medical really do help with your diabetes. Either that, or Cocoon was a based on true story, and Wilford Brimley returns to Earth to make movies from time to time. Okay, the wheels have officially come off this review. The movie sucks. Don’t see it. End of story.

Rating:


“Wesley Willis’s Joy Rides”
a review by Darby O’Gill

Many of you probably have never heard of Wesley Willis, but I do know there are a healthy handful of you out there that do. For those who don’t, Wesley Willis was an artist, a poet, and even a rock star. You could even say he could really whip a horse’s ass. At first glance Wesley may have seemed like nothing more then a homeless chronic schizophrenic, but for those of us who took a moment to take a look closer, we got to see an amazing human being that never let his lot in life get in the way of his dreams. Wesley Willis’s Joy Rides is a documentary, I’m sorry “It’s a Rock You Mentary,” about the life and times of the Fabian Road Warrior himself. The really nice thing about this film is that they don’t just focus on his music and the cult following that followed, but they also spent a great deal of time showcasing his artwork, which is quite outstanding. My only problem with this film is that it seemed to lack a solid structure. We just seem to hang out with Wesley, which is cool, but I would have just liked a little bit more of a narrative on his life. The documentary does have moments like this, but I think a little more insight would have brought this film to the next level.
I’ve been a fan of Wesley’s since college, and I even got to see him perform at a small venue in Columbus, Ohio. To this day, I’m so glad I didn’t let that opportunity pass me by. In the last eight years here in Los Angeles, I’ve been able to see a lot of amazing performances, by some of the biggest names in music, in a room of maybe ten people, and to this day seeing Wesley still tops a lot of those moments. I’m proud to say I was head bunted by Wesley Willis one night at Bernie’s in Columbus. This documentary may not mean that much to you if you’re new to the world of Wesley Willis, but for those of us that do remember him, this movie is a must see. Say Rah… Say Raow… And, you just made Wesley very happy wherever he might be right now. The world is a better place having had you in it big guy.

Rating:


DVD Special Features:

  • Photo Album
  • Art Gallery
  • Deleted Scenes
  • “The Dead and the Dying” Short Film featuring Wesley Willis
  • Audio Conversation Clip

Not a ton of special features, but what it does have is pretty good. The art gallery is fantastic! It’s really great to be able to freeze the images on your television screen to see all the amazing details in his drawings. There’s a healthy helping of deleted scenes, and a really bad short film called “The Dead and the Dying,” featuring Wesley for all of a minute; but it’s a nice thing it have. I’m not really sure of the reason for including the eight minute audio conversation clip, but it’s there if you want to listen to it.

DVD Special Features Rating: